Friday, December 21, 2007

When Pageland grows, where will you be?

With Pageland’s proximity to Charlotte the growth is coming. It doesn’t really matter what you want. Pageland is going to grow.
Pageland and Chesterfield do have some say. The town and county get to either facilitate the growth or stand in the way of it.

Scenario One
Pageland elects responsible leaders that are pro smart growth. These leaders anticipate problems and look for opportunities. In the short term, leaders aggressively facilitate workforce development via resources that are already in the county while simultaneously pursuing new sustainable industry. Our leaders also up-grade our infrastructure so capital is not wasted on fines and inefficiency.
For the long term, our leaders recognize that manufacturing jobs will not sustain our communities and that agriculture, while important, can’t expand enough to cover the burden of fewer and fewer manufacturing jobs. These leaders then expand workforce development which translates into skilled labor and think outside the box for alternative industry. Pageland is no longer reliant on companies that want cheap land and cheap labor that is strategically placed near Charlotte. Industry like this will always be a percentage point on the bottom line away from moving operations overseas. Companies and industry instead are attracted to Pageland and the county because its citizens are able to perform a service or task that other communities can not do at all or do as well. Now Pageland and the county have properly invested in all of its assets not just its proximity.

Scenario Two
Pageland and the county continues its current pattern of being reactionary and under pressure to change, or else. Northeastern Technical College is not recognized as potentially the county’s most precious stepping stone. Infrastructure struggles and fails leading to fines and costly inefficiency. A continued lack of opportunity leads to more disenfranchised youth who without other opportunities turn to lifestyles that are disruptive to the community and in turn cost even more money to keep under “control.” Most distressingly Pageland and the county will experience growth by attrition; a McDonald’s here and a grocery store there, not really the kind of community investment that trickles down. The kind that is already down. Again, relying on cheap labor and location. Faced with similar jobs that pay traditional rates county citizens have no opportunity to invest and profit from county growth. Outside investors will reap the lion’s share of the rewards.
The growth is coming. It is up to the community to decide how it will work with the growth. Will you fight it? Stand in the way of the inevitable? Or will you be proactive? Electing appropriate leadership is key. But in the mean time you can let those that stand in the way of growth know your displeasure. You can call for them to step down. You can let them know you have no confidence in their ability to conduct the people’s business. Those with the loudest voice have the largest responsibility to do this. That means the town’s business owners and employers, those that stand to benefit the quickest from controlled smart growth.
It is my sincere hope Pageland and the County takes full advantage of the opportunities and responsibilities coming up in the next few months and years. I hope the community knows that it is its responsibility to provide for itself and when those that are elected to give professional public service fail to do so it is the community’s responsibility to remove them from these public offices through elections when possible and the courts if necessary. Mistakes now will reverberate for years to come and become exponentially more expensive to correct.

Benjamin Cook is a recent graduate of Dublin City University in Ireland where he received his masters in International Security and Conflict Studies. He is a graduate of Central High.

7 comments:

Sandi McBride said...

My Grandfather, Dwight Douglas, predicted that Cheraw and Chesterfield would meet in the middle and that was 45 years ago...slow growth but practical results!

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Benjamin Cook said...

I believe doing nothing as the Mayor and the council members who voted with him have voted to do is equal to gross neglect. By voting down the measure in question they have voted for crippling the town and insuring it pays fines and loses needed tax rev. These public servants have shown no ability to lead or govern. If they had voted against the measure and suggested an alternative or given adequate reasons why to vote against I would not be singing this tune. But since no viable alternatives or substantial reasons have been given for their votes they must be removed from office for the sake of the town.

Anonymous said...

Does graduating from a university in Ireland make you a professional on economic growth in small towns? I don't think so. The town leaders of Pageland cannot express their views because of a biased hometown paper that caters to those who continually are defeated in the town elections. Example 1: former mayor Brian Hough and Tommy Rivers. As far as I can see, Pageland had 2500-3000 residents 30 years ago and still does today. How about that growth.

Benjamin Cook said...

Does graduating from a university in Ireland make you a professional on economic growth in small towns? I don't think so. The town leaders of Pageland cannot express their views because of a biased hometown paper that caters to those who continually are defeated in the town elections. Example 1: former mayor Brian Hough and Tommy Rivers. As far as I can see, Pageland had 2500-3000 residents 30 years ago and still does today. How about that growth.

________________

Graduating with a BA in Psychology and a MA in "Political Science" doesn't make anyone an expert. It makes them well credentialed. It does teach you to listen to those that know more than you and rely on their previous work to create something useful.

Experience is what makes you an expert. No one who has ever worked for Pageland was more expert than Roland our interim administrator. Why are we not following his advice rather than forcing him out of town? Luckily, the matter at hand doesn't require either credentials or expertise. It requires common sense and the ability to do what is best for your community.

The economics of this situation are very simple. The solution is just as simple. What is complicated is understanding why some people want to ham-string the Town of Pageland.

As for the elections, I don't care who was elected to what office when I only care that Pageland is served by capable public servants. On this particular issue it is not. Allowing Pageland infrastructure to dilapidate to a point where the Federal and State governments are having to intercede is gross dereliction of duty. It is neglect. Postponing the decision until April and offering it up to referendum is WILLFUL neglect and should seen as such and should be advanced as such in the courts if and when other avenues fail. If the public servants charged with the protection of Pageland's assets and capital continue to neglect and squander the capital and assets something must be done.

It doesn't take two degrees and a bit of world travel to see this... it only take a Central High School diploma and common sense.

Ben

Pris said...

I've been reading the debates about accepting the new project terms versus not doing so. I'm not posting to the ins and outs of who's responsible for what in this issue. I wanted to say simply that big doesn't always mean better. I grew up in Pageland when it was a small town, filled with family businesses and restaurants. No fast food places. You locked your doors only if you were going out of town. Neighbors looked out for neighbors and drugs didn't fill the schools. All of this in a small town. It was a good way to live.

Since Pageland, I've lived and worked as a clinical psychologist in several cities, such as St Louis , Honolulu, Boston, and West Palm Beach so I have a perspective on the difference.

I know we'll never return to those days of innocence. It would be naive of me to suggest that, but I find myself really torn on this issue. In many ways, it's been the increasing growth and resultant influx of fast food places that has contributed to many of the unpleasant changes in town, most especially the dying out of family run businesses and the jump in crime. Maybe the assessment about growth should focus not on revenue, but on quality of life for the town's future?

Benjamin Cook said...

Pris, great comment. You bring up excellent points. These points are the same issues small growing towns have gone through forever. How do you best protect the people of Pageland and at the same time plan for the inevitable growth that is coming?

By being proactive and deliberative. So far, in terms of the situtation in question, I have not seen any of that.

I also have lived in big cities and little ones. I have lived in cities, towns, and cross-road communities. My heart lies in Pageland, not Atlanta where I have spent many years. But my experience in Atlanta has taught me that bad public servants are a cancer.

It is not a question of IF Pageland will grow but HOW it will grow. So, going forward without a viable solution to Pageland's sewage problems is neglect. Like I said in the first part of my piece... The hand has been delt and the fact that Pageland will grow is out of Pageland's control. However, what Pageland has almost complete control over is HOW IT WILL GROW.